Search for: "Fells v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 7,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:19 am
In Deborah Dean v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
The short answer - it does not apply.In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:33 pm
In Mata v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:25 am
The case is entitled Isett et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
Ohio et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 5:05 am
Footnote 1 addresses 271(g):When the district court ruled on JAL’s motion todismiss, the law strongly suggested that alleged acts ofinfringement under §271(g) fell outside the scope of §1498(a).See , e.g. , NTP, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm
The goal was not anchored to the ground and fell on top of him. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm
The Castle v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 1:11 pm
In Joe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:19 pm
Narvaez v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 4:49 pm
In Fuller Family Holdings v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
In Starnes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
Longanacre v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Contextually, Useinov was different because focus fell on the precariousness of the applicant’s stay and not whether the persistence of family life was known to be precarious. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:05 am
In Davison v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:42 pm
In Simpson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
(Chambers v. [read post]
