Search for: "Fordham v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 3:02 am
Supreme Court's 2008 judgment in Baze v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 2:32 pm
Nathan, of Fordham University, and Douglas A. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
By Marcus Mintz In a recent case filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Mainline Information Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
PatCon V will be April 10-11 at Kansas.Here are some other large academic conferences that often have IP-specific panels or significant overlap with folks interested in IP. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:35 am
In their fuller examination of Baze v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
"Copyright owners are part of the problem [of the growing strength of the culture of the public domain]", he states. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
Fishman, the Court found that federal labor law did not preempt the state court's ability to enjoin a nuisance; in D'Onofrio v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:04 am
Toth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:55 am
New York State Urban Development Corp., and Goldstein v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
In Kadic v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Beshada v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Michael Fordham QC, that its use is “controversial”. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Gorham et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
As American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:38 am
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
