Search for: "GIVEN v. OWEN" Results 321 - 340 of 408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
In a judgment given on Monday March 26 ([2012] EWHC 756 (QB)), Bean J also granted the additional remedy of an injunction to the Claimant. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation  (Winrow v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The College of Policing has withdrawn proposals that would have given forces the option of not naming people charged with offences after uproar among media groups. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
For those who would rather have the gist, Owen Bowcott’s commentary on the report in the Guardian is an admirable summary of the main points. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
PA Media Lawyer reports that the Attorney General is investigating the case of a Guardian journalist who reportedly tweeted the name of a juror and detail of the legal argument given in the absence of the jury during the trial of Harry Redknapp. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
Regan: In this plurality opinion, Justice Fairhurst, writing for the majority and joined by Justices Madsen, Charles Johnson, Owens and Stephens upheld the revocation of Mr. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Josh Blackman
In December 2014, a motions panel (Prado, Owen, Graves) granted a stay pending appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm looked at the data alongside known cases in this post and suggested that more detail be given about the individual cases and, insofar as they are the subject of public judgments, these should be identified. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
State (May 16, 2008), and distinguishes the current case: Given these distinguishing facts, we believe it would be inconsistent to simply affirm Mitchell's sentence when another panel of this Court has reduced Hunter's sentence to the advisory sentence. [read post]