Search for: "Golden v. State of California"
Results 321 - 340
of 584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:36 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The initiative provides for California’s consent to the creation of six separate states out of what currently makes up the Golden State. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
I am hopeful that current efforts being made by the Consumer Attorneys of California and other consumer interest groups in the Golden State will result in legislation overturning both Howell and Corenbaum! [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
The Supreme Court said in Underhill v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
” Weinberger v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm
A. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Campbell Alliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night – and certainly not a batch of freezing rain and ice that’s currently paralyzing the greater Baltimore-Washington area right now – stays your trusty editors from the swift completion of their appointed rounds; namely, bringing you the weekly roundup of Suits by Suits: It may not make the headlines on cable news channels, but next Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Draper has drafted and submitted to the California Attorney General an initiative measure that would, if it qualifies for the ballot and is then enacted by the State’s voters, amend the California constitution and statutes to provide for the creation of six separate states out of what currently makes up the Golden State. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001), and Northern Ind. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:16 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Reasonable jurisprudence on “limited writ” CEQA remedies emerged (Golden Gate Land Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
The California Court of Appeal recently addressed this issue in Angelica Textile Services v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:43 am
The California Court of Appeal recently addressed this issue in Angelica Textile Services v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:27 am
Lifestyle Improvement Centers, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The truth often is that, for one reason or another, the prescribing physician did not rely on the particular warning in question, and thus a different one wouldn’t have made any difference.There are a number of fact patterns that lead to physician non-reliance, the golden boy of the bunch being when a doctor (a trained professional, after all) already knew about the risk in question and thus did not need to be warned about it. [read post]
