Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 2:24 pm
Circuit’s decision in FEC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm
In this episode of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Tamera and Gordon discuss the latest news and cases involving copyright, trademark, film, TV, and other entertainment law issues.Waite v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm
In this episode of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Tamera and Gordon discuss the latest news and cases involving copyright, trademark, film, TV, and other entertainment law issues.Waite v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:20 am
New York)MANGO V. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:18 am
Supreme Court may well decide whether to review Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:44 pm
In that year she published “The Rise and Fall of Unconscionability as the ‘Law of the Poor,’” which placed Williams v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:57 am
(Docket 20-145 Comments) Broadcasters and other media groups submitted their reply brief in National Association of Broadcasters, et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the fifth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
A Supreme Court of Canada case, Gordon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
A Supreme Court of Canada case, Gordon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
Security Trust & Sav Bank (1958) 162 Cal.App.2d 90, 93, citing Chan Kiu Sing v Gordon (1915) 171 Cal. 28, Kains v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
Security Trust & Sav Bank (1958) 162 Cal.App.2d 90, 93, citing Chan Kiu Sing v Gordon (1915) 171 Cal. 28, Kains v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:25 am
This decision highlights the importance of considering all forms of intellectual property rights when looking to protect a product, although it remains to be seen whether the UK Court will adopt a similar approach, as cases such as Lucasfilm v Ainsworth, demonstrate their reluctance to protect such utilitarian products through copyright. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO IPSO has published two rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 01130-20 Freeley v wharfedaleobserver.co.uk No breach – after investigation 01129-20 Freeley v ilkleygazette.co.uk, No breach – after investigation 01128-20 Freeley v thetelegraphandargus.co.uk, No breach – after investigation 00583-20 Giblin-Jowett v express.co.uk, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 00116-20 McDonald v The… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm
I have already written about the case of Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) where the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker declined the Claimant’s invitation to award pre-judgment interest on costs. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
Gordon Freeman and Dr. [read post]
