Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 321 - 340 of 946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
 If certiorari is granted, the case will join Kiyemba v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm by Victoria Clark
Anthony Kennedy announced he will retire from the Supreme Court, reports the New York Times. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
  (See, e.g., Board of Pilot Comrs. for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo and Suisun v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on this week’s oral argument in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
  (Note: in addition to the petitions listed below, the Court has also distributed two petitions previously mentioned on our watch list: AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
Sarah Grant summarized the recent executive order that allows the Pentagon to recall retired service members. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
Any benefit payable pursuant to subdivision two of this section to a person who is granted retirement for disability incurred in performance of duty pursuant to section three hundred sixty-three-c of the retirement and social security law shall be reduced by the amount of the benefits that are finally determined payable under the workers’ compensation law by reason of accidental disability. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens’ recent book review is still a topic of conversation. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
As many anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision in Blackhorse v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:10 am by Dr Stuart Baran
It seems that the BIA’s submissions persuaded the Supreme Court, and at the very least they were granted considerable respect. [read post]