Search for: "Harding v. Illinois" Results 321 - 340 of 1,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
The key antitrust issue here is this: Illinois Brick doesn't give indirect purchasers (here, the consumers bought phones, but the makers of those devices paid patent royalties to Qualcomm) standing to seek damages under federal antitrust laws; but many states have, as some say, "repealed" (or one might also say "worked around") Illinois Brick by allowing such claims under state competition laws. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
On May 10, 2019, jurors in an Illinois federal court reached a verdict on a case filed in 2016 by Deckers against an alleged infringer for trademark and design-patent infringement: Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:53 am by Amy Howe
The lower court relied on a 1977 case called Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:18 am by Robin Fretwell Wilson
That my friend could die from an infection so suddenly is hard to process. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Brian Corcoran
Their argument cited ongoing litigation in Mondelez International, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]