Search for: "Hart v State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not met,… [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
Tzanou, The Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Normative Value in the Context of Counter-Terrorism Surveillance (Oxford, Hart Publishing 2017), Maria Tzanou, Keele University. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
English v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
English v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am
However, as in civil procedure applicable in the United States, parties may move to compel disclosure if the opposing party refuses or fails to produce documents. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm
His suit challenging the secretary’s decision has already been up to the Supreme Court once – leading to a remarkable 2012 ruling in Salazar v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
Hart Publishing Ltd. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
In both cases, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
In both cases, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
Coase (with help from Grossman and Hart), transaction costs and IPNeil considers that one way to view the discussion set out by Sanford Grossman and Oliver Hart in their 1986 article, "The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration" is to ask: when should one contract with a supplier for a good or service and when should one vertically integrate it by acquisition? [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Catalina v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:21 am
(The airplane example invokes an actual case — McBoyle v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:42 pm
For example, in Muscarello v. [read post]
