Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 321 - 340
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Claims for injunctions failed at the first hurdle in Napier v Pressdram Limited [2010] 1 WLR 934 CA and Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
Actavis (Kluwer Patent Blog) Valsartan – Norway: Valsartan case goes on appeal: Novartis v Actavis (The SPC Blog) Xeloda (Capecitabine) – US: Hoffmann-La Roche files patent infringement complaint against Accord following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:09 am
Nevertheless, the observations that the Court concluded in its rationale, which was first observed in the Hoffmann v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 10:52 am
A European Court of Human Rights held that religion cannot be a factor in deciding custody (Hoffmann v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 891 A.2d 1229, 1236 (N.J. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Cumming v Danson [1942] 2 All ER 653 and Enfield LBC v French cited. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 392 F.Supp.2d 907, 919 (S.D. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1122 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Citing the dicta of Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 and adopting the structured approach in Pozzoli v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, Floyd held that it would not have been obvious to the skilled addressee to extend the seat into bed mode into the triangular space between the back of the seat and the cabin wall (the green section) which, in the BA First application, remained unused except for storage. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
There, Lord Hoffmann questioned the appropriateness of the term deference in describing the relationship between the courts and other branches of state within the separation of powers. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If, at this stage, damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant, "there are no grounds for interference with the defendant's freedom of action by the grant of an injunction" (as per Lord Hoffmann in National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint Corporation [2009] UKPC 16 at [16] - a Privy Council case) . [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 892 A.2d 694, (N.J. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
Events and Broadcasts On 25 July 2011, Lecture by Lord Hoffmann: “Have the European courts gone too far? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
Arden LJ’s answer is that this depends on applying to the contract of employment (and presumably to the articles of association) the process of interpretation that Lord Hoffmann explained in AG Belize v Belize Telecom to ascertain what powers a reasonable man would have understood the MD to have been given by the board. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
" "The second is that it is necessary to distinguish between claims that are difficult to construe or that have a "fuzzy boundary" (in the words of Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2004] UKHL 46, [2005] RPC 9 at [126]) on the one hand from claims that are truly ambiguous on the other. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Supreme Court upholds selection patents: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada et al (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings)… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
They ask as follows: "(i) Are Article 7(2) of [the repealed and re-enacted but regularly cited] Council Directive 89/104 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the associated case-law, in particular the judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases 102/77 Hoffmann-La Roche v Centrafarm and 1/81 Pfizer v Eurim-Pharm and Joined Cases C-427/93, C-429/93 and C-436/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova, to be interpreted… [read post]
