Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
  That someone who the INS knows is present in the United States without authorization would have things resolved in, oh, I don't know, under two decades.Not so, apparently.Impressive on all fronts.P.S. - The Ninth Circuit grants Chay's petition in part and remands. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
  Especially when, as here, they're time-sensitive matters in which delay constitutes a substantial downside itself.It's even worse in this particular case, because the Ninth Circuit ends up doing exactly what the United States asked it to do over three years ago when it filed a motion to remand the case to the BIA. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:20 am
However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that there are serious divergences in the application of supposedly uniformed European law in various member states – in particular in Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.On the nature of the obligations, the Karlsruhe appeals courts appears to be stricter than its British and Dutch counterparts. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
The United States taxes the worldwide income of domestic corporations, but gives them a credit against their domestic taxes for foreign taxes they (or a subsidiary) pay. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am by James Hamilton
It is not for a UK court to go further into that conclusion, said Lord Mance, which may yet be challenged in further United States litigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Holder, holding that Congress acted within its authority in passing legislation that restored copyright in certain foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:44 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Guo, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, islawfully present in the United States on an F-1 studentvisa. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-103, Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]