Search for: "House v. United States, IRS"
Results 321 - 340
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 4:58 pm
United States, supports the defense that, in order for the government to prove guilt, it must prove that the depositor "willfully" violated the statute. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:01 am
Professor Buchanan cites Perry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Of particular relevance was the ECtHR decision in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR 29. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
Levitin also said that the problem could “cloud title to nearly every property in the United States” and could lead to trillions of dollars in losses. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
Go n-éirí an bóthar leat. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:44 am
In Calhoun v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
In Ireland as in the United Kingdom one of the areas in which the transposition of the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law (ECHR Act 2003 (Ire); HRA 1998 (UK)) has given rise to intense litigation is that of public housing and, more particularly, the removal of individuals from public authority housing. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
United States (762 F.2d 1369 (9th Cir. 1985) at 1373): The IRS argues that the phrase means gain from a wagering transaction entered into by the taxpayer. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am
In her first opinion on the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan reports the Justices' 8-1 ruling that a consumer debtor cannot deduct the IRS standard automobile ownership costs from his or her disposable monthly income under the means test if the automobile is free and clear. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Ambler Realty by stating in a forthright fashion that the banning of multi-family housing from residential zones serves no legitimate purpose. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
Should taxpayer's in-house representatives attend? [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Several weeks ago, in Driscoll v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has developed and applied a 2-prong test “drawn directly from the wording of §501(c)(3) and the legislative history of its enactment. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
The first is Frothingham v. [read post]
