Search for: "Hughes v. Heard" Results 321 - 340 of 476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am by Bryan Heaney
The justices that heard the case are Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am by Bryan Heaney
The justices that heard the case are Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am by Laura Sandwell
From Wednesday 9 until Thursday 10 October 2013 is the appeal of Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor, in front of L Neuberger, L Hale, L Kerr, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
As of Tuesday, the day the bill was heard in committee, HB 1608 had 101 "co-authors," four "joint authors," plus of course the primary author Bryan Hughes for a total of 106 out of 150 House members, or 71% of the Texas House, so far. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: ZAM v CFW heard 19 March 2013 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The trial in Thompson v James will be heard on 13 February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Four - Ashcroft v Foley, Cairns v Modi/KC v MGN, Cammish v Hughes and Rothschild v Associated. 9. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
  In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]