Search for: "In Re Goldstein"
Results 321 - 340
of 845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
But I think that attendees will remain awake for the "Great Debate" because not only are we going to tackle some very interesting, timely issues, but the panel is a first, I believe, for CAAA with employer and defense representation.On the panel with me are: Christine Bouma, a member of the California Commission on Health Safety and Workers' Compensation;Dan Bagan, a member of the California Commission on Health Safety and Workers' Compensation;Jeremy Merz, a Policy Advocate for… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioners in NACS.] [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:03 pm
For skilled, determined representation in your alimony matter, reach out to the New Jersey family law attorneys of Goldstein, Bachman & Newman, LLP. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:23 pm
This means that the state that heard and decided your divorce or other family law matter may not be the state where you’re living when a new issue arises. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:29 am
Cir. 2006); In re Harris, 409 F.3d 1339, 1341 (Fed. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Gelineau, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Portland, Oregon and Michael Rikon, Goldstein, Rikon, Rikon & Houghton, P.C., New York Dropping the Bomb: Challenging Highest and Best Use – Mark D. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
After that, you’ll temporarily have to go elsewhere if you’re looking for an endless series of disappointments. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am
The court in MDL 1935, In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, used Rule 58(b) in this way. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:05 pm
“The standards we’re asking from the manufacturers go above and beyond the quality of the chicken we normally purchase at local supermarkets,” said USFA Chairman Eric Goldstein and chief executive officer of School Support Services for the New York City Department of Education. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
In re Ryan 14-375Issue: Whether this Court should issue a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition ordering the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to issue the mandate in Henry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
An agreement signed by cruise executive Adam Goldstein is attached. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
It has been almost ten years to the day since the Supreme Court’s last substantive attention to trademark law. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
With what’s left of Thanksgiving coming up, we are obligated as denizens of the Internet to do a post on things we’re thankful for. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am
” Richard Re of Re’s Judicata continues his discussion of circuit precedent and “clearly established law,” this time with a focus on Monday’s summary reversal in Glebe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Briefly: Richard Re of Re’s Judicata has the second part of his discussion of the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
We’re still trying to figure out the Court’s practice of “rescheduling” cases (i.e., deciding before the scheduled Conference date to move the case to another Conference). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 4:29 am
And finally, if you're planning on traveling to the City of Lights, which we do frequently, there is a tiger on the loose in Paris! [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in this case.] [read post]
