Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Investigation" Results 321 - 340 of 1,444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm by Elliot Setzer
. ● We undertake rigorous, long-term investigations. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
Trump additionally cites two OLC opinions from 1985 and 1986 to argue that the executive branch can judge the “legitimacy” of a congressional investigation. [read post]
Tuesday, February 11, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold a discussion on Chinese interference in Taiwan’s elections. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Additional Information: Successful completion of a background investigation is required for interning at Brookings. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
These conversations are important, and they’re endlessly fascinating theoretically. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:12 pm by Mieke Eoyang, Anisha Hindocha
As many have explained, the House impeachment investigation was analogous to a grand jury investigation, with the resulting impeachment vote akin to a decision to indict. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:25 pm by Postali
A federal grand jury indicted him for illegal re-entry and failure to register as a sex offender, per 18 U.S.C. 2250(a). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
They do not expressly cover any earlier disputes over congressional subpoenas, or anything related to the Mueller investigation. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A second case involved the administration’s appeal of a judge’s October ruling that grand jury information in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe should be provided to lawmakers. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Any review of a calendar year at the Supreme Court necessarily includes two different terms: the term that ends in June and the new one that begins in October and will run into the following year. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Bill Mears and Shannon Bream report that “[a]t issue is the extent a sitting president can be subject to congressional oversight — under ‘valid legislative purposes’ — of his private business dealings before he took office[; t]he high court will also look at the extent a sitting president can be subject to state and local grand jury investigations and prosecutions. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm by Jim Sedor
If the high court decides to order full briefing and argument in both cases, it could lead to landmark decisions this term on the ability of prosecutors and Congress to investigate the president. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
November 4, 2019 – 2nd Circuit vacates dismissal on Younger abstention grounds but affirms district court’s ruling on the immunity question, stating that “any presidential immunity from state criminal process does not extend to investigative steps like the grand jury subpoena at issue here. [read post]
  In both cases much of the investigative work had been done earlier, in secret:  by special counsels working within the Department of Justice, and before grand juries. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  Cox secured a grand jury subpoena requiring the President to produce even more of the tapes. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:10 am by SHG
Here, as typical under these situations, OAG obtained authority to conduct the 2017 grand jury investigation through a combination of Executive Law § 63 (2) and EO163. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
“[W]e’re not saying we’re telling the actual story, we’re telling our story,” he told IndieWire. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The ethics panel also said it would continue investigations into allegations against U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Div. 1997) (“If the Grand Jury does not return a true bill after re-presentment of the charges that are contained in the original indictment, the Grand Jury’s return of ‘no true bill’ creates a legal impediment to conviction of defendant requiring dismissal of the indictment. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The staffer explained that Sondland had called the president and Trump could be heard asking about “the investigations. [read post]