Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 321 - 340
of 14,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2008, 10:47 pm
Trying to slip this unpersuasive opinion past military justice practitioners while they're semi-comatose from tryptophan overload would have been a far better idea than publishing it.Here's the essence of the opinion:[W]e find appellant's rights under Article 31, UCMJ . . . were triggered when appellant was interviewed at the same time and location by a special agent of the U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
If the decision of the Chief Justice is law, slavery may be re-established under the Constitution of the United States any day . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:16 pm
That seems to be what the Court of Appeal holds.But it may also be that the Court of Appeal's opinion may appear to demand a degree of certainty in the presentation of such evidence that's contrary to both public policy and common sense.I'd have liked to see something in Justice McConnell's opinion that balanced the need for "some" evidence against the need for "perfect" evidence. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
As the Court announced on Thursday, we’ve got only one opinion day to go before the Court is in summer recess . . . and we’re still waiting, breathless, for opinions in some of the Term’s highest-profile cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Sotomayor. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:29 pm
Justice Slough's opinion is 94 (!) [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:07 pm
A one-justice lead opinion (complete with "I"s) is very confusing. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:45 am
Justice Bedsworth.I should have known.Anyway, extremely well done. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:57 am
" Several Members of this Court have said that it merits reconsideration in an appropriate case [citing opinions by Justices Alito and Thomas, and by Chief Justice Roberts]. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 5:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Acer America Corporation (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
“Ethics Committee Advice for Justices whose Staff Attorneys Had Prior Involvement in a Matter” — “The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) has issued an expedited opinion about the obligations of an appellate justice whose staff attorney previously practiced as counsel in civil cases challenging conditions of criminal confinement. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
The Justices hear oral arguments, and without notice, issue an opinion months later. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
In re Rolando Caballero, No. 07-0484. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
Absent compelling evidence that is nowhere to be found in the Court’s opinion, I could not possibly conclude that the Framers made such a choice. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:38 am
In re James E. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 12:39 pm
" More specifically, she suggests that "the way the opinion was written does open the majority to attack along the very lines [Prof. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:50 pm
The Report produced by this Committee on Defamation, which came to be known as the Faulks Committee after its chairman Mr Justice Faulks, was presented to Parliament in March 1975. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC19372 - In re Yasiel R. [read post]
