Search for: "In Re SDS" Results 321 - 340 of 533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm by Jay Fishman
"* Rules registering securities by coordination or qualification would eliminate a sentence stating that a broker-dealer registered under the SD Uniform Securities Act may omit Form U-2. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:04 am by Liz Dunshee
Tomorrow’s Webcast – “Conflict Minerals & Resource Extraction: Latest Developments” Tune in tomorrow for the webcast – Conflict Minerals & Resource Extraction: Latest Developments – to hear our own Dave Lynn of Morrison & Foerster, Lawrence Heim of Responsible Business Alliance/Responsible Minerals Initiatives, Michael Littenberg of Ropes & Gray and Christine Robinson of Deloitte discuss what you should be considering as you prepare this… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:13 pm by Bill Marler
If you or a family member became ill with a Salmonella infection, including Reactive Arthritis or Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark Salmonella attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:54 am
  As I argued earlier this year (parts one and two), a levy to address P2P may make sense, yet the current approach, which could lead to levies on SD cards, doesn't work. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the court’s determination, however, JB failed to establish that the doctrine of judicial estoppel applies with respect to NACH or Alf, because JB failed to establish as a matter of law that NACH or Alf, as non-debtors, were in privity with NAC (see In re Avaya Inc., 573 BR 93, 103-104 [SD NY 2017]). [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:54 pm
  The first panel on Day Two was devoted to four federal trial judges:  Chief Judge Bob Conrad (WD NC), Judge Gregory Presnell (MD FL), Chief Judge Robert Hinkle (ND FL), and Chief Judge William Moore (SD GA). [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:21 am by Glenn Reynolds
(I’ve a gasoline powered turtleneck sweater and a fur lined sink available for purchase if you’re interested.) [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 7:19 pm
  It'd be interesting to see what Stephanie Herseth in SD and Earl Pomeroy in ND would do. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
A score below 80 triggers a re-inspection in 60 days when all identified violations must be corrected. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:43 pm
By now, we're part of the family. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
In In re Mercury Interactive, Litigation Release No. 20724 (SD CA Sept. 17, 2008), a settled injunctive proceeding, the complaint "alleges that the outside directors recklessly approved backdated stock option grants and reviewed and signed public filings that contained materially false and misleading disclosures about the company's stock option grants and company expenses. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:48 pm
" http://bit.ly/fMnb6t DE BK Atty Ryan Murphy examines Rule 2019 amendments & potential impact on distressed debt investors & ch 11 generally. http://bit.ly/h68X5E 7th Cir denies DIP lender unpaid fees under interim DIP order based on its anticipatory breach of DIP loan agreement. http://bit.ly/hLIMVG SD TX Judge Bohm denies post-confirm trust standing bec Plan lacked "specific and unequivocal" language preserving claim. http://ow.ly/4dHRl … [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN1] After the verdict, Placeres filed for bankruptcy, but he was ultimately denied a discharge because he “knowingly failed to disclose” his potential malpractice claim against his litigation counsel, for the errors resulting in the $900,000 pain and suffering award (In re Placeres, 578 BR 505, 523 [Bankr SD NY 2017]). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am by Josh Glazov
Boatmen's First National Bank of Kansas City 8th AR, IA, MO, MN, NE, ND, SD 1995 Young v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:14 pm
You can use this to your advantage, and move some of those high speed SD cards onto a peg of cheaper SD cards. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 C: any you’re sure are sold without a claimed license? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is an appeal against the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).The Search Division (SD) had issued a declaration under R 45 EPC 1973 that the claims were directed at non-technical subject-matter excluded from patent protection or notorious technical means for their implementation. [read post]