Search for: "In re: Davis v."
Results 321 - 340
of 1,769
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Davis, 537 A.2d 1100, 1119 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
(Illinois approved the measure on June 10, 2019, and for technical reasons then re-approved it a week later, but June 10 marks Illinois’ official adoption and serves to distinguish Illinois as the first state to sign on.) [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
Parke, Davis & Co. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
The final opinion today is from Alito, and we’re moving from the T-shirt shop at the mall to the high seas. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:05 am
The opinion – Stein v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
The original precedent set in the Tennessee case of Davis v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:47 pm
They're vulnerable people buying used cars. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Davies v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case, TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Ever resourceful, they manufactured a particularly Machiavellian rationale, riding the coattails of Justice Breyer’s dissent* in Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am
Davis is the latest in a string of cases stemming from Johnson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
