Search for: "In re David L" Results 321 - 340 of 2,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 11:03 am by Andrew Koppelman
” The term, which originally referred to crack houses in poor neighborhoods, has, according to Urban Dictionary, “since been abused by high school students who like to pretend they're cool by drinking their mom's beer together and saying they're part of a ‘traphouse’. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Some economists, however, take a Scalian "get over it approach," telling those of us who try to set the record straight that this is old news and not worth re-fighting. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Touchstone Wireless Repair & Logistics, LP (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 215, 222; BBA Aviation, at p. 428; In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & II (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 100, 110.) [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:39 am by AAEPA
Ice Casino owo nowoczesny serwis hazardowy, który jest projektowany z myślą o zapewnieniu swoim odbiorcom kompleksowych usług, opierających się na wszechstronności i wygodzie. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
Clark and Heather L. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
This essay is not a normative argument in defense of deference, but rather an account of how the District Court in Texas boldly—and without discussion or acknowledgment—did away with such deference in ordering the Biden administration to re-start MPP, and how the Supreme Court, in refusing to stay the injunction, seemed not to mind. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:35 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Michael-David, LLC, Serial No. 88662293 (August 28, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:02 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  It reasoned that Lafarge did not deliberately associate itself with those crimes.[1] The French Supreme Court remanded the case so that magistrates can re-examine Lafarge’s request to dismiss the case. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:02 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  It reasoned that Lafarge did not deliberately associate itself with those crimes.[1] The French Supreme Court remanded the case so that magistrates can re-examine Lafarge’s request to dismiss the case. [read post]