Search for: "In re Marriage of Brown" Results 321 - 340 of 430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 2:58 pm by Tinu
  After a series of invocations, musical selections, and greetings from our esteemed head table (including Senator Scott Brown's "Can't we all just get along?! [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:12 am by Ryan Roberts
I had the chance to chat with Mike Brown Jr., Founder and Partner at AOL Ventures, a few weeks ago. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm by Robin Mashal
Justice George is well-known for authoring California Supreme Court's 2008 opinion the case of In re Marriage Cases, case number S147999. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Campbell & William Brown, Assessing Effects of Pretrial Publicity through Agenda-Setting and Framing. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:35 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0050, 2010 MT 265N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: MAGGIE RAE BROWN, Petitioner and Appellee, and RICHE ALLEN HOLLAND, Respondent and Appellant. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am by Stevie E. Leahy
 Judge Hawkins jumps immediately to a comparison to school segregation, which Cooper unsuccessfully attempts to distinguish using SCOTUS Loving precedent (re interracial marriage). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  “I don’t think Ted Olson is a conservative,” says Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
In contrast, the court—in the case of In re Marriage of Thornhill (Colo. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:58 am by David G. Badertscher
Hynes would be compelled to borrow Trump's trademark tagline: "You're fired. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
It is also virtually impossible to defend today, was put into the Constitution by Framers who didn’t trust the People to elect the president, and yet we’re still stuck with it. (3) Perhaps more important than the Constitution’s containing some indefensible provisions is the fact that it’s largely irrelevant to current political arrangements: We’ve ignored the document, and the Supreme Court, its supposed guardian, has largely acquiesced in that arrangement (and… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:26 am by David G. Badertscher
Brown could still return to prison on two other convictions that were not overturned. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Still less, it would appear, do private citizens possess authority regarding the issuance of marriage licenses or registration of marriages. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
“We’re in uncharted waters here,” Amar told TIME. [read post]