Search for: "JOHN DOE COMPANY 1, INC."
Results 321 - 340
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
Justice Myers noted that civil proceedings are assumed to involve claims and judgments in personam (against a person), which is why “John Doe” placeholders are used until a defendant is identified. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:34 am
This arm does not pivot, does it? [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:07 pm
For instance, when the Comcast – NBC Universal deal closes (assuming, of course, that it does), Comcast will control a cable system, a broadcast network, and multiple cable channels, whereas Time Warner Cable is a cable system only (that’s because Time Warner Inc. spun off TWC) and Fox’s parent, News Corp., lacks a cable system. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
" Provisions for civil liability of users of the electronic trademark without permission are also provided, as well as details regarding the creation of a searchable electronic trademark database.An example of one company, 1 800 Contacts Inc., may benefit from this Act as it is noted that this company, located in Utah, has taken at least one internet advertiser to court for unauthorized use of its company name in advertising. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
Law Judge John H. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
In re Oak Park Brewing Company, Inc., Serial No. 86329948 (February 14, 2016) [not precedential].Material alteration: In an application under Section 1(b), an applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:16 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:25 am
And how does the Board know why these companies and authors used both terms? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Grace & Company, Inc., Alvin H. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
John M. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am
Nelson, Esq. and John W. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
Under Section 15(c), a company is also prohibited from profiting from someone’s biometric information. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
Under Section 15(c), a company is also prohibited from profiting from someone’s biometric information. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
Under Section 15(c), a company is also prohibited from profiting from someone’s biometric information. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by telling John Rowe that activity for the Auto Workers played a role in his discharge. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
" Despite the fact that Opposer, a Cuban entity, "does not and cannot engage in any business in the United States due to the embargo on Cuban goods," the Board concluded that Opposer has a "real interest" in the outcome of this proceeding, and thus has standing.Turning to the merits of the 2(e)(3) claim, the pertinent elements were set out in In re California Innovations Inc., 66 USPQ2d 1853, 1856-57 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Google and other large U.S. social media companies operate global platforms. [read post]
