Search for: "Jacobs v. Major" Results 321 - 340 of 634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
”  Since a stay requires a showing of a “reasonable probability” of a cert. grant and a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude that the decision below was erroneous, there is a good chance we’ll see a grant of at least one of these cases once all the briefing is in. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of his argument by explaining that `New Mexico recognizes two major approaches to the defense of entrapment, the subjective approach and the objective approach. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:12 pm by Ben Rubin
 Writing the decision for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts distinguished the raisin farmer’s situation from the oyster farmer’s situation addressed in Leonard & Leonard v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm by Ben Rubin
 Writing the decision for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts distinguished the raisin farmer’s situation from the oyster farmer’s situation addressed in Leonard & Leonard v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court says that unpaid volunteers who worked at Major League Baseball's Fan Fest in 2013 were not entitled to any compensation.The case is Chen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
” But Justice Miller’s opinion for the majority enforces a narrow and somewhat weird combination of a few rights that were included in the text and others that were not. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses “law and symbolism” at the Court and argues that the “majority got it right” with its ruling last week in Walker v. [read post]