Search for: "James C Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2015, 9:09 am by Lisa Baird
To learn more about “implied certification” liability under the FCA, read the Client Alert written by Reed Smith attorneys James C. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:09 am by Lisa Baird
To learn more about “implied certification” liability under the FCA, read the Client Alert written by Reed Smith attorneys James C. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
McKinley Jr., James C, “2 Companies Accused of Faking Safety Checks at Building Sites,” The New York Times, 2 July 2014. [read post]
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
The Image of Liberty was Steven Douglas Smith’s at the University of San Diego School of Law. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD1949.A2 D43 2015Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp & Frederick Wilmot-Smith, eds., Defences in Tort (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Schachtman
Smith, whose testimony has been the subject of several judicial exclusions for lack of validity. [7] Lorillard, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
  The Advisory Committee Notes explain that the various techniques of discovery kick in by virtue of Rule 26(b), where automatic disclosure and report requirements of Rule 26(a) leave off: “Rules 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) do not impede discovery about the opinions to be offered by the expert or the development, foundation, or basis of those opinions. [read post]