Search for: "James v. Holder" Results 321 - 340 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1498 ; 09-89 Title: Holder, Attorney General v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am by David Gans
More than a week after oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
The policy holder isn’t provided with any information regarding steps they could take to protect themselves against such abuses. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
Although such advertisements use trademarked terms in commerce and are geared toward increasing the ad buyer’s business at the trademark holder’s expense, they do not implicate the Lanham Act because they draw a clear distinction between the products and do not imply the trademark holder’s sponsorship or approval. [read post]