Search for: "Lady v State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
Dust off your old property texts and grab your briefcases, ladies and gentlemen! [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 7:49 am
In Lady Donna Dutchess v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Instead, it followed the Florida state appellate court's legal holding in Hall v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:08 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:44 am
First use of phrase "legalistic argle-bargle" since 1824's Gibbons v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Conrad v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale (with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Kerr agreed). [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:07 pm
Catherine Conrad v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
Lady Frances V, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
Therefore, agreeing with the Government’s reasoning, Lady Hale held that: It follows that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Akhtar and Bibi must be overruled and that this appeal must be allowed by consent in terms of the detailed order proposed. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 2:44 am
"Petitioner, in obtaining its two registrations, stated that "aachi" means "distinguished lady" in English. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
