Search for: "Lewis v. Chicago" Results 321 - 340 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Chicago, the first employment law case of this term, and Holder v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court granted cert this morning on Ricci and the Section 108 question:Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Certified question (5th Circuit) Cases from OT08: Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Illinois: Chicago Family Law Blog by Alan Pearlman, Esq. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 10:40 am
Though a bit loud.Anyway, one of the defendants (Lewis) died, another was convicted on pretty much all counts (Inzunza), and the third (Zucchet) was convicted on a plethora of charges but had all but two of those convictions thrown out by the district court judge for insufficient evidence (and a new trial granted for those two to boot). [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm by justinsilverman
Chicago Sun-Times political reporter Abdon Pallasch is the named respondent in McKevitt v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Chicago Dynamic Industries, 201 U.S.P.Q. 25 (N.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
June 11, 2009Re: Irving Picard’s Three Percent Commission In The Madoff Case. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
City of Chicago, No. 08-974 - T VIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogo SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)2nd CircuitDuffett v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:32 am
The Supreme Court yesterday invited the Solicitor General to comment on the cert. petition in Lewis v. [read post]