Search for: "Linda S. Williams" Results 321 - 340 of 930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
The Supreme Court’s rejection of that claim, in a 1989 opinion written by Chief Justice William H. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Dawn Johnsen
Justices David Souter and Clarence Thomas had succeeded Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, leaving only two of Webster’s four dissenting Justices supportive of Roe. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
It’s unclear why Linda Greenhouse chose to give a constitutional quiz, but it serves well to remind us why the police owe us nothing. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:42 am
McCoy, Angela Couloumbis, and Linda Loyd have this front page article in today's edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen looks ahead at the death penalty case Williams v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Both divorced their Lindas and remarried women named Betty; Both had sons who they named James Alan, and James Allan. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 5:20 am by SHG
I assigned a reading by Linda Williams, a chapter from her book, Screening Sex.It looked in intimate detail at the first blaxploitation film ever made– Melvin Van Peebles’, Sweet Sweetback’s Badasssss Song (SSBAS). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:57 am
Lynch to the position of Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, brings the Board’s membership to twenty-five (25) Administrative Trademark Judges. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
With the publication of Sisters in Law:  How Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World, lawyer and philosopher Linda Hirshman takes on both O’Connor and Ginsburg, situating their respective ascents to the Court within the broader women’s rights movement. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"And, for a final dose of SCOTUS for the weekend, here is a New York Times review of Linda Hirshman's Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World (Harper). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
 But I lost the presumed liberal.And while the plural of anecdote is not data, the story says something about the Justices Linda Hirshman calls "sisters in law. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: Elsewhere in the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Mauro reviews Sisters in Law, Linda Hirshman’s new book on Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Mary Ziegler
Williams argues in a forthcoming book, abortion opponents also responded to the decision by prioritizing a constitutional amendment. [read post]