Search for: "Little Wishes v. Little Wish Foundation"
Results 321 - 340
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Source: Sales Tax Clearinghouse; Tax Foundation, Facts and Figures 2018: How Does Your State Compare? [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Because the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the IRS and Department of Justice offshore enforcement efforts continue to raise the risk of detection of taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts and assets for the foreseeable future, it has been determined that 2012 OVDP should be modified and made available to taxpayers who wish to voluntarily disclose their offshore accounts and assets to avoid prosecution and limit their exposure to civil penalties but… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
Defense counsel objected on first amendment grounds, and the judge semi-sustained the objection on the basis that it had little or nothing to do with the science. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
Allow citizens to have private ownership of their computers and the ability to employ them as they wish to employ them. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
Unlike most of his books, which are long, hefty, this one is a little book. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am
The South Carolina Chamber of Commerce commissioned the Tax Foundation to prepare a review of the South Carolina tax system and recommend possible solutions, and this book is the result. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Customary Inuit adoptions, for example, bear little or no resemblance to the statute-based systems of adoption that exist in Canadian provinces and territories. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
To Quebec, the legislative recognition as a “nation” did little: This motion did not create any specific measures favourable to Québec, nor did it translate into actions enabling Québec’s traditional demands to be adequately met. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Jude Children’s Research Hospital became our ‘friend in need’, along with the ‘Make a Wish’ Foundation. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
The Bill has evolved significantly, shedding and adding features as it has been buffeted by gusting political winds, all the while (I would say) teetering on defectively designed foundations. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
If policymakers wish to arrest the outmigration of jobs and people to more welcoming climes, they will need to do something about a tax code that increasingly penalizes those who might otherwise be inclined to stay. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
" (Hong Kong protesters hold banned Tiananmen vigil as anthem law is passed).During deliberations, Elizabeth Quat of the pro-Beijing DAB party said democrats should not be a public servant if they do not wish to respect the national anthem: “If lawmakers oppose the national anthem bill, they are violating basic political ethics. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But people wish they could afford the protections of a lawyer’s solicitor-client relationship instead of having to depend upon merely LegalZoom’s buyer-seller relationship. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
There are no general rights to legislate as an executive wishes. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
” Philip Rosen believes that this practice reflects a prosecutorial bias on the part of the Department of Justice, resulting in a “deference to judicial determinations of guilt and an insufficiently rigorous questioning of the foundations of criminal convictions. [read post]
