Search for: "M B v. J D" Results 321 - 340 of 2,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board notes that its approach, although it has not always consistently been applied in the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal, is also in line with the reasoning in earlier decisions which have argued that an appeal is deemed not to have been filed where the appeal fee was paid in time but the notice of appeal was filed only after expiry of the two-month period of Art.108(1) (see in particular decisions J 19/90, r.1.2.2 and 4; T 445/98, r.1.2, 5, 6 and 7; and T 778/00, section… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:39 am by Eugene Volokh
And “personal identifying information” is defined to mean “the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-1102,” which in turn provides that this information “may include” a person’s: (a) name; (b) birth date; (c) address; (d) telephone number; (e) drivers license number; (f) Social Security number; (g) place of employment; (h) employee identification numbers or other personal identification numbers; (i) mother’s maiden name;… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
  TEXAS No State Income Tax  UTAH 2.30 - 6.98 (t) 6 1,000 (b) - 5,501 (b) 2,550 (d) 5,100 (d) 2,550 (d) * (t) VERMONT (a) 3.6 - 9.5 5 30,650 (u) 336,551 (u) 3,400 (d) 6,800 (d) 3,400 (d) VIRGINIA 2.0 - 5.75 4 3,000 - 17,000 900 1,800 900 WASHINGTON No State Income Tax  WEST VIRGINIA 3.0 - 6.5 5 10,000 - … [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chaque semaine, nous vous présentons un résumé d’une décision d’un tribunal québécois qui nous est fournis par la Société québécoise d’information juridique (SOQUIJ) et ayant un intérêt pancanadien. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Part 1 and part 2 of this series examined the historical context of the debate surrounding dairy product food safety, and the mechanisms by which pasteurized or raw dairy products may become contaminated with foodborne pathogens. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As usedin Rule 60(b)(3), “‘[m]isconduct’ does not demand proof ofnefarious intent or purpose as a prerequisite to redress.. . . [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chaque semaine, nous vous présentons un résumé d’une décision d’un tribunal québécois qui nous est fournis par la Société québécoise d’information juridique (SOQUIJ) et ayant un intérêt pancanadien. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 23 March 2022 Steyn J heard an application in the case of QRT -v- JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]