Search for: "M. Stephen Peters"
Results 321 - 340
of 602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Peter Keisler arguing for petitioners. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
“Product safety has to be a high priority for every manufacturer of foods sold in the United States” says Stephen M. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Co-Convenors of Law.gov: Jack M. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm
Stephen Peters 5310 Ward Road, Suite G-07 Arvada, Colorado 80002 E-mail: peters@msplaw.org Phone: (303) 422-8501 Simon E. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
In one such article in The Australian, the Internet Industry Association spokesman Peter Coroneos is quoted:Internet Industry Association spokesman Peter Coroneos said the industry is working closely with the Government on the policy to be trialled later this year. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Co-Convenors of Law.gov: Jack M. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 5:49 am
I’m not sure this vendetta against the #BBC is going to end well. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Now, I'm not one to believe in the existence of single-dimension people. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Academics who presented papers included: Peter Sherer, Professor, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Predicting the Future of Large US Corporate Law Firms: AmLaw 2025 Stephen Mayson, Professor, Legal Services Policy Institute, College of Law of England and Wales, London, Global Law Firms: A Strategy Looking for a Market? [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:30 am
i'm hoping for chrissie swan ... [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Breakfast address by Professor M. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:54 am
Posted by Patrick M. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
Martin, Chairman of M·CAM Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:03 am
Peter Rachman, whose actions pre-date Cathy Come Home and upon which so much of modern legislation was based, is long dead and so is his business model. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Haahr, Peter C. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
” I’m not sure if he believes that these problems are fatal, in other words, that the notion of “group rights” is somehow morally or legally incoherent or normatively indefensible. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
– obvious errors in Crovitz’ article (IAM) (IP Watchdog) Bilski at the BPAI – What a mess (Part 1 – Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PPAC meeting sets the stage for patent quality improvements (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Did you know... that public interest factors can trump the finding of a violation at the ITC? [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
Davidoff StevenDavidoff Ohio State Jeremy de Beer jdebeer Ottawa Sarah Deer sarahdeer William Mitchell Michelle M. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Access to standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms is not a "left or right" question.I'm not aware of any other patent blogger who would have declared himself a support of Donald Trump as early or as unequivocally as I did (January 2016), and there are several policy areas in which I really like it when the Trump Administration does away with Obama policies that I consider misguided and some of which clearly failed (especially in the… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
