Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C" Results 321 - 340 of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
Under subsection (2), in addition, the issuing authority must consider the following: (a) any family law orders in force in relation to the defendant, or any pending applications for family law orders in relation to the defendant, of which the issuing authority has been informed; (b) the accommodation needs of the protected person; (c) the defendant's criminal record as defined in the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act ; (d) the defendant's previous conduct whether in… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In his defence to C&RT’s Part 8 claim, Mr J asserted, so far as is relevant to this appeal: “10. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In part b/c of fundamental culture of sharing entrenched in dance historically and today. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by INFORRM
(c)  In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Ray Dowd
C–11–02533–(DMR).July 8, 2011.Brett Langdon Gibbs, Steele Hansmeier, PLLC, Mill Valley, CA, for Plaintiff.ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY IN PART; SEVERING DOE DEFENDANTS FROM CASE; AND ORDERING DISMISSAL OF THEIR CLAIMSDONNA M. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:29 am by Barbara Moreno
McClean, Strategic Planning:  As Simple as A, B, C (2015). [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:10 pm
It was John's first--and last--pro bono matter. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]