Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 321 - 340
of 895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm
A similar statement came from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, suggesting that the main purpose of the designation is to chill foreign financial institutions and companies from transacting with the IRGC or any related entities. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The Society of Editors duly lobbying the Culture Secretary in favour of “freedom of expression”. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Because of my pro-copyright positions in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 12:09 pm
V. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:35 am
” State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Speakers will include Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and moderator Kathleen H. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Sumption gave the main judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
The Court then turns to whether Plaintiffs proved that those forms of injury are fairly traceable to Secretary Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 census and whether they are redressable by a favorable decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Giving the main judgment, Sales LJ held that any further guidance was unnecessary because the correct approach to instructing experts is found in the Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chambers of the First-tier and Upper Tribunal 2014. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:50 am
Zach ZhenHe Tan assessed the impact of Jesner v. [read post]
