Search for: "Mann v Does" Results 321 - 340 of 550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  This include Article 13 which requires digital platforms to check that content uploaded by users does not breach copyright. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In part as a result of these efforts, the issue has come before multiple courts, with varying outcomes.In 2016 the issue reached the Supreme Court, which granted certiorari in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned on Friday 4 July 2014, Mann J heard the last CMC in Tranche 2 of the Phone Hacking Litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Ronald Mann analyzes Tuesday’s argument in Liu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm by Giles Peaker
This was based on Haringey LBC v Hickey(2006) EWCA Civ 373. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
In real life meanwhile big-ticket libel suits are used to silence conservatives [Competitive Enterprise Institute press release (leading media orgs including RCFP, SPJ, ASNE support rehearing of D.C. court ruling favorable toward Michael Mann defamation action), NR editors, Jack Fowler] “The media’s Covington coverage was appalling, but Nick Sandman’s libel lawsuit is not the answer” [Robby Soave, Irina Manta] Another part of the forest: Justice Clarence Thomas… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:55 am by Terry Hart
— Finally, next week, the Central District Court of California will hear arguments on motions for summary judgment in Paramount v Axanar, a case involving an allegedly unauthorized spin-off of Star Trek. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2017, Mann J heard an application in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]