Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 21,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am by David Post
The parties had stipulated to certain facts, and the Court adopted those: Ms. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Vito Todeschini
Enforced Disappearance Convention (Article 9), and the recently-adopted Ljubljana-The Hague Convention (Article 8). [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The problem here is that Freed silenced Lindke on his private Facebook page that also addresses public matters. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The last two points, in particular, mean that even if no on-balance sheet assets are acquired, and even if a single transaction does not meet the all or substantially all test, but subsequent transactions result in a cumulative satisfaction of the test, the FDIC will consider them to be BMA transactions (although it is unclear, in the case of relying on subsequent transactions to meet the test, when the BMA application would need to be submitted and what its scope would be: all of… [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The allegation that Commissioner Harpstead intended the trainings to change minds for life does not by itself demonstrate the required compulsion. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 7:12 am by Evan Holober and Geoffrey B. Fehling
Similarly, where a policy is triggered by a claim for a “wrongful act,” policyholders should confirm that the insurer’s interpretation adheres to the actual definition of wrongful act and does not adopt a narrower view than what the policy says. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am by Rebecca Hamilton
This is relevant since the ITLOS Statute includes jurisdiction over “all matters specifically provided for in any other agreement which confers jurisdiction on the Tribunal. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
(Related  to the Treaty of Waitangi, Article 12.1, paragraph 2 says the digital chapter does not apply to: "(c) measures adopted or maintained by New Zealand that it deems necessary to protect or promote Māori rights, interests, duties and responsibilities1 in respect of matters covered by this Chapter, including in fulfilment of New Zealand's obligations under te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi, provided that such measures are not used as a… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
(Related  to the Treaty of Waitangi, Article 12.1, paragraph 2 says the digital chapter does not apply to: "(c) measures adopted or maintained by New Zealand that it deems necessary to protect or promote Māori rights, interests, duties and responsibilities1 in respect of matters covered by this Chapter, including in fulfilment of New Zealand's obligations under te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi, provided that such measures are not used as a… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
If our law societies were to adopt or apply such a rule, they would be tacitly undermining or objecting to this important principle. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm by Julian Morris
Klein does not have access to those higher-value rewards cards, but if so, he is the exception, not the rule. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
So, when the First Amendment instead speaks of abridging the freedom of speech, it would seem to be adopting a different measure of government action for that right. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am by Gabriel Greif
As the Court of Appeal stated, ‘Our narrow holding does not in any respect call into question the well-recognized authority of local entities to regulate the location of oil drilling operations, a matter not addressed by section 3106 or Measure Z. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Just because a company uses an alternative method to go public does not mean that its investors are any less deserving of time-tested investor protections. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
States are free to adopt their own eligibility requirements for presidential candidates as a matter of state law (as distinguished from Section 3). [read post]