Search for: "Matter of Morales v Morales" Results 321 - 340 of 4,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 9:21 am by Buce
  No matter where she goes or what she does, the shoes keep dancing.Link (paraphrased). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
Now in its fifth edition, this book offers a readable introduction to digital copyright and related areas such as moral rights, database rights and competition law.The Beijing Internet Court heard its first copyright case, regarding plagiarized content on Douyin, the Chinese equivalent of Tik Tok. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am by Kevin Sheerin
Application for Pistol License Denied Due to Criminal History In the Matter of Ralph Velez, Jr. v Robert M DiBella Pursuant to Article 78, petitioner appealed a determination by the respondent denying his application for a pistol license. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" He has made it clear that, in addition to rejecting Roe and Casey, and the delegation doctrine, a particular object of his scorn is Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:40 am by Mills & Mills LLP
The Nature and Extent of the Duty to Account One such tale was recently explored by the court in Iannarelli Estate v Abbruzzese, 2023 ONSC 7262. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
 * Glenn Gould and the case for moral rights in sound recordingsKatfriend Mira T. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, citing Jones v Filkins, 238 AD2d 954, said that the removal of an official from office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 "generally will not be granted absent allegations of self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust[,]” while allegations of  “minor neglect of duties, administrative oversights, or violations of law do not, in general, warrant… [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also does not apply to moral rights, b/c travaux suggested moral rights are reserved, and Art 10(3) provides different requirement for attribution of source. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
The basic thrust of the piece is to argue that the Roberts Court has become “the judicial voice of the idea that nearly everything works best on market logic, that economic models of behavior capture most of what matters, and political, civic, and moral distinctions mostly amount to obscurantism and special pleading. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
The basic thrust of the piece is to argue that the Roberts Court has become “the judicial voice of the idea that nearly everything works best on market logic, that economic models of behavior capture most of what matters, and political, civic, and moral distinctions mostly amount to obscurantism and special pleading.” [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:32 am by David Friedman
That, it seems to me, is an interesting question, one relevant to both law and  morality. [read post]