Search for: "Matter of Said v Said" Results 321 - 340 of 30,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm by Larry
It must, therefore, address the matter before it. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am by Frank Cranmer
The Court had also previously acknowledged on several occasions that the protection of animals was a matter of general interest under Article 10. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:57 am by Eric S. Solotoff
That said, the Appellate Division remanded the matter to the trial judge “to clarify if plaintiff’s failure to report her income triggered his obligation under Sheridan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
was always more than a bit of a stretch, but this is ridiculous.Again, content matters. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:58 am by Giles Peaker
I would put the matter as follows. [read post]