Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 321 - 340
of 30,721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
He said: Disobedience to court orders is no small matter. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
It must, therefore, address the matter before it. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
Vichy Springs Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:14 am
” “In Occidental Exploration and Production Company (OEPC) v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am
The Court had also previously acknowledged on several occasions that the protection of animals was a matter of general interest under Article 10. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
He said that he had fired an M16, th [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:57 am
That said, the Appellate Division remanded the matter to the trial judge “to clarify if plaintiff’s failure to report her income triggered his obligation under Sheridan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm
Hanrahan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
was always more than a bit of a stretch, but this is ridiculous.Again, content matters. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:58 am
I would put the matter as follows. [read post]