Search for: "Matter of Turner v Turner"
Results 321 - 340
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
Turner, 45 N.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
FN4 For a discussion of the difference between these two concepts, see Turner v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:54 am
Image courtesy of Flickr by Brian Turner. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
As an initial matter, the statute does not apply to non-attorneys, such as the Individual Defendants (see Neroni v Follender, 137 AD3d 1336, 1338 [3d Dept 2016], appeal dismissed 27 NY3d 1147 [2016], rearg denied 28 NY3d 1024 [2016]). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
John Thompson, No. 09-571 (3/29/2011) “District attorney was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on a 42 U.S.C.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Co., 303 AD2d 323, 324; Turner Constr. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
That is a matter for you to decide. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The grounds of appeal are helpfully summarised in Louise Turner’s post on the application for permission to appeal. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
" Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Turner Construction Co., 560 F.Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y.1983), went the other way. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
Turner, No. 2:20-cv-04073-JDW (E.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am
According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), anti-suit injunctions are incompatible with the Brussels I Regulation [see C-159/02 Turner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:58 am
— The preceding reflects a California appellate court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
