Search for: "Matthews v. Little" Results 321 - 340 of 638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA),[9] has been interpreted by at least two U.S. courts to forbid production of stored data of certain types only where the data are stored in the United States.[10]  With respect to U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance, the rules are much more complex,[11] but unlike the Wiretap Act and the SCA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act[12] generally prohibits conduct only by persons acting under… [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 5:41 am by SHG
Lawprof Paul Gowder tried to hijack the post, reflecting his need to reread Matthews v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
  The Supreme Court in Matthews v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
Hourly billing v fixed-fees. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Rory Little covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Tony Mauro (who also covers yesterday’s decision in Kingsley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
A final little thought experiment: Imagine if President George W. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
To be sure, such approaches have their own problems and they have received little to no attention in courtroom proceedings to date. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Bill Graham, Warren v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]