Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
At the time of the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 Marchand v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm
In Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:05 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
The opinion in Hampshire Group Limited v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:12 am
Filed: May 21, 2012Opinion by Judge W. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
A Brief History of Boards of Directors Oversight of Financial Accounting and Reporting. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:16 am
C&J Energy Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:06 am
Supreme Court issued a ruling in Matal v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board May 2015 Graves v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
A seminal example is what occurred in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
The staff confronted a shareholder proposal that required mandatory reimbursement of proxy expenses for shareholders who nominated a short slate of directors and succeeded in electing at least one to the board. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
Finally, access to board documents may be further limited by the need to protect confidential board communications. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Boards and their advisors seeking to navigate the culture wars and their often conflicting pressures from a variety of stakeholders and outside groups may find some comfort and guidance in this recent decision from the Delaware Chancery Court in Simeone v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Boards and their advisors seeking to navigate the culture wars and their often conflicting pressures from a variety of stakeholders and outside groups may find some comfort and guidance in this recent decision from the Delaware Chancery Court in Simeone v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:15 am
Rejecting the director defendant claims that the fiduciary duty claims were not ripe, the Court stated that Healthways’ stockholders may presently be “suffering a distinct injury” from the deterrent effect of the “proxy put” and the fact that the dissident directors are non-continuing directors under the “proxy put. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
On May 13, 2022, in Crest v. [read post]
