Search for: "Miner v Miner"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 5:02 am
SCOTUS granted cert in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm
Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:51 pm
The case is Ridge Natural Resources LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 11:40 am
The recent decision on jurisdiction, liability and quantum in Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm
Smith Logging Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:29 am
Technical Disclosure – The common downfalls in technical disclosure are (i) the failure to file current or fully compliant reports; (ii) the failure to include the required cautionary statements for preliminary economic assessments, historical estimates and exploration targets; (iii) disclosure of mineral resources and mineral reserves that do not fully comply with NI 43-101; (iv) misleading references to mining studies; and (v) the failure to name the qualified… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:28 am
In this case Petitioner Scott Howard, a miner, sought a writ of mandamus from the court directing the Secretary of Labor to promulgate lower limits for the amount of dust and silica in the air in mines. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:40 am
But in ConocoPhillips, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:01 pm
Metso v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:53 am
In Martin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 12:03 pm
In Ridge Natural Resources, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:47 pm
The Appellate Division dismissed a challenge to a special permit, when the petitioner delayed bringing an Article 78 proceeding while the recipient of the special permit continued with construction. in Matter of Miner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:43 am
For example: “Imminent” = friend “Might” = not friend “Likely” = friend “Could” = not friend “Irreparable” = friend “Money damages” = not friend In Lightning Oil Company v. [read post]
3 May 2006, 4:46 am
The PTO had deemed the mark confusingly similar to the registered marks BLACK MARKET MINERALS for "retail jewelry and mineral store services" (MINERALS disclaimed) and BLACK MARKET for women's clothing. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
Leslie v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:06 am
Mineral estate ownership Potter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:07 am
In Texas Outfitters Limited v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 10:39 am
Pending before the Texas Supreme Court is the petition for review of Ammonite Oil & Gas Corporation challenging the decision of the San Antonio Court of Appeals in Ammonite Oil and Gas Corp v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:25 pm
Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. [read post]
