Search for: "Office of People's Counsel v. PUBLIC SERV."
Results 321 - 340
of 1,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
V, § 2. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am
The ensuing public debate prompted the Court to make the following clarification a month later in Ng Ka Ling v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
No question many of us would like to be here right nowState v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Some people may know of Dr. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am
Many police chiefs agree — law enforcement officers are not the right people to respond to someone in a mental health crisis. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
The passage of the Act serves as a signal to begin preparation for compliance. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
The passage of the Act serves as a signal to begin preparation for compliance. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
For example, an officer could not be removed from office for refusing to self-incriminate (Fifth Amendment) or seeking the assistance of counsel in a criminal prosecution (Sixth Amendment). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
For those who are interested in going over that old ground, see this publication. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
In this case from the Western District of North Carolina, the defendant was serving a term of supervised release. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
While not government agencies themselves, the pair operate under congressional charters and serve “important public missions,” which includes providing “liquidity, stability and affordability to the mortgage market. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
Perhaps even more fundamentally, any approach that privileges whichever branch can act and object more—as the gloss approach does—will systematically favor the president over Congress, because the president can act more easily and has invested in institutions like the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), whose role is to object to perceived constitutional intrusions by Congress. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Office of Special Counsel—an independent federal investigative body with no connection to former Special Counsel Robert Mueller—disclosed that it has found “a substantial likelihood of wrongdoing” under Pack’s leadership at the USAGM. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
Those factors are: (1) the gravity of the public concern served by the seizure; (2) the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest; and (3) the severity of the interference with individual liberty. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Our invaluable local counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
