Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am
It is by no means inconceivable that bills will be introduced seeking to impose, in GM-like situations, a Sarbanes-Oxley style “reporting” requirement on internal lawyers (or outside counsel, or both), coupled with a “private attorney general” concept and whistleblower bounties. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
The latter half of the Article concludes that much of the compliance officer’s work falls within two categories: corporate policing and corporate architecture. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:31 am
The majority’s reasoning placed heavy emphasis on the purposes of Sarbanes-Oxley in preventing fraud at public companies. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Plaintiff Webb-Weber was the chief operating officer of defendant Community Action for Human Services, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:49 pm
I have been considering current efforts to implement the U.N. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:30 pm
The Act established a separate office in the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-7451 (involving whether Sarbanes-Oxley’s “anti-shredding” prohibition can be used to go after small fry) were first-time relists last week. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
" The Federal Public Defender's Office for the Middle District represents Yates. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
, without having to pay the usual fees, due to his penury), which was prepared by the public defender's office. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Yates contends that section 1519, enacted as part of the ‘anti-shredding provision’ of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, was never intended to prohibit the destruction of non-documentary, non-informational items such as fish and thus did not apply to his alleged destruction of fish,” his petition says. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
North Carolina, 13-604 (involving the validity of a search resulting from a police officer’s mistake of law); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:53 am
No, today, we’re talking about Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Protection. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:25 pm
Attorney's Office in the Western District of Washington is prosecuting the case." [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:58 pm
Imagine you are a federal prosecutor and the following fact pattern lands on your desk: a college student has gained unauthorized access to the email account of a candidate for federal office. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:20 am
The Sarbanes Oxley Act was enacted nearly twelve years ago in the midst of profusion of corporate scandals. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Lawson are protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Supreme Court focused on the relevant language of the anti-retaliation provision, which prohibits any publicly traded company or any “officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company” from retaliating against an employee who provides information or otherwise assists in certain investigations into possible violations of the Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
Department of Labor Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower web page. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
Employees of private contractors and subcontractors who provide services to publicly traded companies including mutual funds are protected by the whistleblower provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Act"), the United States Supreme Court held in its decision dated March 4, 2014. [read post]
