Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
North Carolina, 13-604 (involving the validity of a search resulting from a police officer’s mistake of law); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:53 am
No, today, we’re talking about Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Protection. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:25 pm
Attorney's Office in the Western District of Washington is prosecuting the case." [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:58 pm
Imagine you are a federal prosecutor and the following fact pattern lands on your desk: a college student has gained unauthorized access to the email account of a candidate for federal office. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:20 am
The Sarbanes Oxley Act was enacted nearly twelve years ago in the midst of profusion of corporate scandals. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Lawson are protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Supreme Court focused on the relevant language of the anti-retaliation provision, which prohibits any publicly traded company or any “officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company” from retaliating against an employee who provides information or otherwise assists in certain investigations into possible violations of the Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
Department of Labor Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower web page. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
Employees of private contractors and subcontractors who provide services to publicly traded companies including mutual funds are protected by the whistleblower provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Act"), the United States Supreme Court held in its decision dated March 4, 2014. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:31 am
FMR argued that an “employee” must be limited to public company employees to avoid the “absurd” result of extending protection to the personal employees of company officers and employees. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:48 am
The Court further observed “that Congress was as focused on the role of Enron’s outside contractors in facilitating the fraud as it was on the actions of Enron’s own officers. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
FMR LLC, 572 U.S. __ (2014), the Court held that Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower anti-retaliation protection, which prohibits public companies or any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such companies from retaliating against an employee because of whistleblowing or other protected activity, extends to employees of the public companies’ contractors and subcontractors. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
FMR LLC, resolving a dispute over the scope of the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
SOX Whistleblower Protection Extends to Employees of Private Contractors, According to Supreme Court
6 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm
Supreme Court ruled that employees of private contractors and subcontractors who contract with public companies are protected under the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:22 am
FMR argued that an “employee” must be limited to public company employees to avoid the “absurd” result of extending protection to the personal employees of company officers and employees. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:21 am
In reversing a First Circuit decision, the Supreme Court majority held that whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act cover employees of private contractors and even subcontractors that are hired by publicly traded companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court has opened up an enormous pool of potential whistleblower claimants against employers who might not otherwise be covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court has opened up an enormous pool of potential whistleblower claimants against employers who might not otherwise be covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:45 am
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) covers everything from mandatory financial disclosures to enhanced penalties for white-collar crime to requiring a company’s CEO to sign corporate tax returns. [read post]
