Search for: "People v Brian D." Results 321 - 340 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Robinette, Peerless Mentor: An Appreciation by George D. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax is imposed on revenue from digital advertising served to people in Maryland, which will drive up the cost of advertising to Marylanders. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm by admin
Brian has a corporate law practice and, as an in-house counsel, I appreciate how his blog reflects the concerns of corporate counsel and business people. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
There are few people who can put up with me for 10-hours straight, but we both had a great time. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Intellectual PropertyKF2994 .C62 2010Copyright law and a brief look at the Google Library Project / Brett D. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:18 am by Michael Lowe
For more, read: “9 New Gun Laws Now In Effect In Texas; Some In Response To Church And Mass Shootings,” written by Brian New and published by CBSDFW on September 2, 2019. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]