Search for: "People v David S." Results 321 - 340 of 5,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The scheme has been devised from its earliest iterations with a view to preserving the character and interior of St John’s. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  ICYMI: R v Penguin Books Ltd: When Lady Chatterley’s Lover was Put on Trial (The Collector). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Jack Goldsmith's and my article with this title is now out in the Texas Law Review, as is David Post's response (many thanks for writing that, David!). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Ms Enright is not convinced: “It’s time for the Government to respond to the peoples renewed call to recognise the non-marital family in the Constitution”. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Leila Nadya Sadat
Ambassador for War Crimes David Scheffer has noted, this would mean that U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the… [read post]