Search for: "People v High"
Results 321 - 340
of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
FlynnThis ruling is going to get some attention in high places. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:13 pm
District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Gennady V. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Defendant immediately told Parker she was driving with her high beams on. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 7:12 am
Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
If you think that’s crazy, consider it in light of what Justice Sotomayor wrote in her concurrence in the 2012 case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
The test has altered little since the 19th century, when in the 1885 case of Durham v Durham, it was stated: the contract of marriage is a very simple one, which does not require a high degree of intelligence to comprehend. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:21 pm
Richard Banks,Is Marriage for White People? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
Russia the ECtHR has applied a very high level of free speech-protection for aggressively insulting and hostile comments about police officers, published on a weblog. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Case citation: Maynard v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
Some people might be […] Read More [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:18 am
That is, 83-16.The A+C v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:14 pm
In Risko v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
In recent years, members of the media have accurately reported likely rulings in high-profile cases, suggesting that they had access to otherwise confidential information from people inside the Court. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 pm
One underappreciated, though critically important, impact of Dobbs is the extent to which newly enacted abortion restrictions will increase both the number of people with high-risk pregnancies and, relatedly, the number of people who are coerced into medical treatment during labor and delivery. [read post]
