Search for: "People v. Fews"
Results 321 - 340
of 14,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
As the Court explained"Reversal [of that conviction and dismissal of the ninth count] is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted [attempted murder], resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the [g]rand [j]ury to determine the charges" (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858, 858; see People v Comfort, 31 AD3d 1110, 1111, lv denied 7 NY3d 847). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
California calculates that there are 594 such people. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
The state of Washington just won summary judgment on remand in the Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:44 am
In reality, few people are actually charged with a violation of PC 240. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 10:55 am
Jason Gillmer, Gonzaga University School of Law, has published Pearson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 10:55 am
Jason Gillmer, Gonzaga University School of Law, has published Pearson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:18 am
Few if any interpretations in the area of criminal or criminal procedure law have been issued for public comment. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
My partner Keith Sabey had the privilege of representing Virginia Derksen, one of the successful parties in the case of Werbenuk v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:19 am
In first morning of the Capitol Records v. [read post]
A Few Notes: A New Legal Theory For Collection of Fees & Prostitution Stings Bring a Call For Reform
28 Oct 2006, 11:22 pm
On the first day they arrested 21 people who allegedly worked and owned alleged massage parlors. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Musnuff v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
In Olmstead v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:17 am
Over the last few years, the cruise industry has consistently grown. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Just a few days after the original broadcast, you can now watch the canine Court hear arguments in: Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
Just a few days after the original broadcast, you can now watch the canine Court hear arguments in: Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
If that's the case, it would be problematic for the Court to reach any conclusion that retributivism supports the death penalty here -- when so few people who have consistently and mindfully aligned themselves under retributivism's flag take the opposite view. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
Supreme Court made in Campbell v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:24 am
The unrest was on this plan of the Central People’s Government to instill a political process similar to the National People’s Congress. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 8:39 am
This is what happened in People v. [read post]
