Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 321 - 340
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 12:35 am
It was at the Warren in Hayes, Kent. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
Second, “public use” seems on its face to require, well, “use” by the “public”: if the people (or the government as representative of the people) aren’t entitled to do things on or with the property, as is the case when the property is given to a private entity, the amendment is not satisfied. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
& Rawle 394 (Pa. 1824); People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
In other coverage of and commentary on yesterday’s order list, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on yesterday’s denial of review in Woodward v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the week ahead at the Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Community Action Agency of Kent County is recommending its seniors stretch the food they already have by watering down milk and soup. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am
And it seems like basic justice that people should not stay in prison if their sentence was imposed illegally. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
This decision, following on the heels of the May 21, 2013 opinion in Hart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Professor Kent Bernard agreed that the Act is “weird,” but argued that it did not create the problem. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
