Search for: "People v. Sparks" Results 321 - 340 of 717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm by Susan Brenner
People like you should be forced out of this country. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm by Liz Campbell
As was reiterated earlier this year in Lynch v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform, preventative justice “has no place in our legal system” (People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   Our humble hope is to help spark fresh ideas about the role American constitutions might play in the democracy some of us hope to create. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
  NDAs spark Opternative v Warby Parker dispute:  Last week, Warby Parker - an eyewear retailer - was hit with a trade secrets lawsuit brought by Opternative (a Chicago-based healthcare technology start-up) in the Southern District of New York alleging that Warby Parker violated a non-disclosure agreement and misappropriated trade secrets. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Wednesday morning the justices got a rare opportunity to ponder basic principles of tort law, as they closed the October session with the argument in Air and Liquid Systems v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm by Ronald Mann
The Justices had tough questions for both sides Monday morning in Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:40 am by SHG
Ignoring the hyperbole, recognition of bad caselaw, from Terry v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Inevitably, the liberalization of habeas rules sparked a conservative backlash. [read post]
7 May 2025, 12:04 am by Josh Richman
  Resources: Digital Defense Fund and its 2022 EFF Award Dobbs v. [read post]