Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Good)"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 5:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:29 pm
The dispute in Turnage v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:52 am
The latter can be tough to prove, though the Florida Supreme Court did find in the 1991 case of Ellis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Part V: The Role of the Courts in the Application of Law: Judicial Review, Methodologies of Interpretation, and Legitimacy closes the circle by bringing the focus back to the courts and their engagement with law. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
In Scheehle v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:08 pm
The case is STATE v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In Friedlander v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In Friedlander v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
In the 1990s the Court extended this doctrine to include the judicial review of the contents of contracts, based on the interpretation of ‘good morals' and ‘good faith' in the light of fundamental rights. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
There will be other chances to convince other panels of the Court of Appeal that our view of Conte - and of the scope of products liability generally - ought to prevail.So with that in mind, we offer our closing arguments on Conte, for the good of the order. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Yesterday, counsel for Huawei in the UK Supreme Court hearing in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
Under this act, the judges of the Superior Court annually appointed a member of the bar who had practiced at least five years to represent persons accused of crime. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
