Search for: "People v. Sweet" Results 321 - 340 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by SHG
After a relatively clear, albeit lengthy, discussion of why lawyers aren’t pro wrestlers, Paul’s solution to the merit v. genitalia problem is to redefine merit. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
And so too will the fine people of Prague, Doc Martin included.In Tinker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
” Among other reasons, the information was derived solely from LinkedIn’s transactions with the plaintiffs and not from third parties, LinkedIn was not a “consumer reporting agency” under the Act, and the list of possible references was not, itself, used or intended to be used for an employment purpose (Sweet v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
One big one is that people think the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
The designated publishers on the staff would most likely be excited by the challenge, while the C-Suite people would be horrified. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
 The Kat wants to know if there is anyone out there in private practice who thinks that they might be able to persuade a British court to order a party not to apply for other people's trade marks and/or not to assert other people's trade marks, or any similar relief, can he or she please email the IPKat here. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]