Search for: "Poole v. Lowe" Results 321 - 340 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
For example, the Fifth Circuit in Stokes v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
The potential plaintiff pool for this case is large since over 50,000 women are diagnosed yearly. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Natalia Kubesch
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This was from a pool of 3.7 million women who have used the drug for a medical termination of pregnancy since it was first made available in 2000. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
You need prevention to defend against low-focus attacks and to make targeted attacks harder. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  An organisation will also have a defence if it can prove that it either had reasonable procedures in place to prevent the fraud, or that it was reasonable not to have such procedures (such as where the risk of fraud is extremely low)i. [read post]